Cases 1 - 10 of 88
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00373
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1211 - Americans with Disabilities Act
Hairston v. McGuire
as 1:2023cv00082
Plaintiff:
Robert David Hairston
Defendant:
Officer W. W. McGuire, R. S. Dyson, Sgt. C. C. Butler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00517
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Mays et al v. The Cabell County Board of Education et al
as 3:2022cv00085
Plaintiff:
Herman Mays, Jr., C. M., Elizabeth Mays and others
Defendant:
The Cabell County Board of Education, Ryan Saxe and Daniel Gleason
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stevenson v. Clark et al
as 1:2021cv00625
Plaintiff:
Ryan Blake Stevenson
Defendant:
Lisa Davis Clark, Derek C. Swope and Julie Ball
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Abels v. Mason County Commission et al
as 2:2021cv00594
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Abels
Defendant:
Mason County Commission, Jackson County Commission, City of Ravenswood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. City National Bank of West Virginia et al
as 1:2021cv00519
Plaintiff:
Grover C. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
City National Bank of West Virginia, Shelby Crouse and Others to be Named
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Conley v. Paitsel et al
as 1:2021cv00205
Defendant:
A. S. Primmer, John Doe No. 3, John Doe No. 4 and others
Plaintiff:
Dallas Conley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Field et al v. Facemire et al
as 5:2021cv00198
Defendant:
G. Russell Rollyson, Jr. and James A. Facemire
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Field and Robin M. Field
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
