Cases 41 - 50 of 767
Bellamy v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00336
Petitioner:
Eric Moore Bellamy
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Bailey v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00337
Petitioner:
Sarah K. Bailey
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Curtis v. Ryle
as 1:2023cv00329
Petitioner:
Leslie Erin Curtis
Respondent:
United States of America and Gretchen Ryle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Tackett v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00303
Petitioner:
Bert Tackett
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Fillman v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00233
Plaintiff:
Barry Paul Fillman
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Chi v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00196
Plaintiff:
Anson Chi
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Romer v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00162
Petitioner:
George Albert Romer, Jr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Terrell v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv00145
Petitioner:
Jason Michael Terrell
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Boone v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00109
Petitioner:
Omarr D. Boone
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
