Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Anderson v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2024cv00184
Petitioner:
Ricky Samuel Anderson
Respondent:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, WRJ, SRJ and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Anderson v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023cv00554
Petitioner:
De'Andre Anderson
Respondent:
W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Anderson v. Holzapfel
as 5:2023cv00490
Petitioner:
Dewayne Anderson
Respondent:
FCI Beckley Warden W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Anderson v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00448
Petitioner:
Elvis Anderson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Friend v. Circuit Court of McDowell County, W.V. et al
as 1:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
John David Friend
Defendant:
Circuit Court of McDowell County, W.V., Ed Cornish, Floyd Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Feather-Gorbey v. Williams et al
as 5:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
Williams, Forren, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Light v. Viani et al
as 2:2020cv00113
Defendant:
John Anderson, Captain D. Bailey, Angelo J. Viani and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Colton Light
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Barkley et al
as 2:2019cv00198
Defendant:
Nathanial Barkley, John Doe and The West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anderson v. Coakley
as 2:2019cv00194
Petitioner:
Justin B. Anderson
Respondent:
Joe Coakley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thaxton v. W.V. DOC Commissioner et al
as 2:2019cv00033
Defendant:
Sgt. Slater, John Anderson, Jim Grey and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin C. Thaxton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
