Cases 1 - 10 of 4,693
Paulk v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00316
Petitioner:
Mickey Paulk
Respondent:
Warden W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Adams v. Dodrill et al
as 2:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Keith Deshon Adams
Defendant:
Oak Hill Police Offi Brandon Dodrill and Oak Hill Police Offi Tyler Hogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grammer v. Cutright
as 1:2024cv00312
Petitioner:
Susan Diane Grammer
Respondent:
C. Cutright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brown v. Farrell et al
as 3:2024cv00309
Plaintiff:
Michael E. Brown
Defendant:
Paul T. Farrell, Tim Armstead, Elizabeth D. Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00310
Petitioner:
LaDonna Jones
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nicholas v. White et al
as 2:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
James Lee Nicholas
Defendant:
Ron White and Josha Dowing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guthrie v. Cutwright
as 1:2024cv00307
Petitioner:
Traci Lynn Guthrie
Respondent:
Warden Cutwright
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lanham v. Aramark Food Service Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Levi Lanham
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service Corporation, Anthony Booher, Correctional Officer Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcum v. Daff et al
as 2:2024cv00295
Plaintiff:
Jeremy A. Marcum
Defendant:
Shane Daff and Montana Covert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saleh v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00294
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Saleh
Defendant:
The United States of America, Warden K. Heckard, Chaplain Weaver and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
