Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Graham v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2022cv00541
Plaintiff:
Cody Graham
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Corporal Hendrix and Corporal Hayhurst
Guardian Ad Litem:
Denali S. Hedrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Graham v. West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2022cv00467
Plaintiff:
Cody Graham
Defendant:
West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Johnny Wilson, CO II David Ewing and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Feather-Gorbey v. Williams et al
as 5:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
Williams, Forren, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kelly v. West Virginia Regional Jail Correctional Facility Authority et al
as 2:2018cv01074
Plaintiff:
Farrell G. Kelly
Defendant:
West Virginia Regional Jail Correctional Facility Authority , Barrett, Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham v. West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority et al
as 2:2017cv03065
Plaintiff:
Ryan Graham
Defendant:
West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority , Whited, Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thorne v. West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority et al
as 2:2017cv03070
Plaintiff:
Dustin Thorne
Defendant:
West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority , Channel, Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lanham v. West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority et al
as 2:2017cv03067
Plaintiff:
Charles Lanham
Defendant:
West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority , Miller, Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
