Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Conner v. Warden et al
as 1:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
John Henry Conner, Jr.
Defendant:
Warden, Merick Garland and Colet Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Schubert v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Allan Schubert
Defendant:
M. Gonzales, S. Thorne, R. D. Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Echols v. Cutright
as 1:2023cv00761
Petitioner:
Olivia Toy Echols
Respondent:
C. Cutright and Collette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Parks v. Ryle et al
as 1:2022cv00584
Petitioner:
Donna Parks
Respondent:
Warden G. Ryle and Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Branham et al v. Federal Correctional Institution McDowell et al
as 1:2022cv00437
Plaintiff:
Justin Branham, Jonas Edmonds, Dion Johnson and others
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Institution McDowell, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Colette S. Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Holbrook v. Sandy et al
as 2:2022cv00031
Plaintiff:
Tex Gene Holbrook, II
Defendant:
Jeff Sandy, Betsy Jividen, Donnie Ames and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peters v. Warden
as 1:2021cv00203
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden
Petitioner:
Spencer Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Peters v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv00802
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Melvin Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Rodger II of the family of Atwood v. Connor et al
as 2:2017cv01180
Petitioner:
Rodger II of the family of Atwood
Respondent:
Christopher C. Connor, Christy H. Fawcett, James T. Clancy and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Miller v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2016cv05638
Plaintiff:
Andre Miller
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein , David Ballard , Anthony Kidd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
