Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Rodriguez v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00527
Petitioner:
Ruben Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pedraza-Rodriguez v. Rokosky et al
as 1:2023cv00102
Petitioner:
Edgar Gibrian Pedraza-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky and Acting Warden Lefever
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Morgan v. Young et al
as 5:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Dairion E. Morgan
Defendant:
FCI Beckley Warden Young, FCI Beckley Warden Heckard, Doctor Roger Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Feather-Gorbey v. Williams et al
as 5:2021cv00673
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
Williams, Forren, Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Feather-Gorbey v. Morris et al
as 5:2021cv00395
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
Counselor Morris, Counselor Burnett, Co- Harbery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Feather-Gorbey v. Young et al
as 5:2021cv00373
Defendant:
Young, Rodriguez, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Feather-Gorbey v. Manning et al
as 5:2021cv00270
Defendant:
Farr, Morris, Toney and others
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Feather-Gorbey v. Smith et al
as 5:2021cv00209
Plaintiff:
(Chief) Col. Michael S. Owl Feather-Gorbey
Defendant:
Rodriguez, Smith, Swagger and others
Interested Party:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Isaac v. Rikard
as 1:2017cv02236
Petitioner:
Emanuel Rodriguez Isaac
Respondent:
Barbara Rikard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rodriguez v. Young
as 5:2017cv01323
Plaintiff:
Ruben Rodriguez
Defendant:
D. L. Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
