Cases 11 - 20 of 78
Abbott et al v. CSX Transportation, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv02302
Plaintiff:
Donna Abbott , Machele Abbott , Anthony Akers and others
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc. and Sperry Rail, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blair v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01826
Plaintiff:
Bambi Blair
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington v. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources et al
as 2:2016cv10189
Plaintiff:
Josephine Louella Washington
Defendant:
West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources and LaDella Blair
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Washington v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2016cv10191
Plaintiff:
Josephine Louella Washington
Defendant:
Melissa Gillespie, Melissa Shephard, Meghan Gofreda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Washington v. Gillespie et al
as 2:2016cv10195
Plaintiff:
Josephine Louella Washington
Defendant:
Melissa Gillespie, Melissa Shephard, Meghan Gofreda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blair v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08035
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth K. Blair
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blair v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv05304
Plaintiff:
Denise Blair
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blair et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2016cv04653
Plaintiff:
Deborah Blair and Gary Blair
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Combs (Blair) v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv02807
Plaintiff:
Linda Combs (Blair)
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blair et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv15240
Plaintiff:
Carol Blair and David Blair
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
