Cases 31 - 39 of 39
Rush et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv05119
Plaintiff:
Patricia Rush and Randy Rush
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rush et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv03771
Plaintiff:
Mary Ellen Rush and Arlen Woods, Sr.
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rush v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv03511
Plaintiff:
Mildred M. Rush
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rushing v. Boston Scientific Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv03001
Plaintiff:
Sallie Mae Rushing
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation , American Medical Systems, Inc. , American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rush et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv09919
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Rush and Earl Martin Rush
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Rush v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01884
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Rush
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS and American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perry v. Rush Trucking Company
as 3:2011cv00957
Plaintiff:
Samuel D. Perry
Defendant:
Rush Trucking Company
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301
Rakes v. Rush et al
as 2:2009cv00018
Plaintiff:
Lola Rakes and Lola Rakes
Defendant:
Franklin Rush, Franklin Rush, Gordon Clark and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Thomas v. Ardenault, et al
as 2:2008cv01377
Plaintiff:
Franklin Douglas Thomas
Defendant:
Mark J. Ardenault and Rush Co. Services Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
