Cases 31 - 40 of 121
Griffith v. Nibert et al
as 2:2016cv04574
Plaintiff:
Travis A. Griffith
Defendant:
State of West Virginia and Deloris Nibert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eggleston v. Burke et al
as 5:2016cv04451
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Eggleston
Defendant:
Austin G. Burke, Paul O'Dell, Joe Delong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Travis v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv04363
Plaintiff:
Sharon Travis
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harshaw v. West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority et al
as 2:2016cv03678
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Harshaw, Jr.
Defendant:
West Virginia Regional Jail and Correctional Facility Authority , Austin G. Burke , Travis Crook and others
Movant:
United States of America and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Brown et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv02134
Plaintiff:
Dana Brown and Travis Brown
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanderson et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv01639
Plaintiff:
Liza Sanderson and Travis Sanderson
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hollis et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00951
Plaintiff:
Carmen Hollis and Travis Hollis
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tolliver et al v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2016cv00521
Plaintiff:
Richard Travis Tolliver and Erin F. Tolliver
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stewart et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv16343
Plaintiff:
Marietta Stewart and Travis Stewart, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Travis et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv16043
Plaintiff:
Blonnie Travis and Ronald E. Travis
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
