Cases 51 - 60 of 136
Honaker v. Town of Sophia
as 5:2015cv03483
Plaintiff:
Travis Lane Honaker
Defendant:
Town of Sophia , Town Council of Sophia , Sophia Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01830
Plaintiff:
Betty Greeson Cox and Allen Lane Cox
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv00038
Plaintiff:
Barbara E. Lane
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Schmidt et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv31366
Plaintiff:
Susan S. Schmidt and Lane D. Schmidt
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv31499
Plaintiff:
Judith Lane
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv31384
Plaintiff:
Tommy N. Lane, Sr.
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv27043
Plaintiff:
Rebecca C. Lane
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc., Sofradim Production SAS, Ethicon, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Westmoreland v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2014cv26935
Plaintiff:
Gary Lane Westmoreland
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lane et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv26555
Plaintiff:
Betty Lane and Jarrell C. Lane
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Porst et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv25369
Plaintiff:
Mildred Porst , Beverly Sellers , Myrtle Malcolm and others
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS, Tissue Science Laboratories Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
