Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Jarrett v. Jaburs et al
as 2:2021cv00629
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jarrett
Defendant:
Terry Jaburs, Regional Jail Authority, D.C.R. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarrett v. Regional Jail Authority et al
as 2:2020cv00625
Defendant:
Regional Jail Authority and South Central Reg Jail
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jarrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Western Regional Jail et al
as 3:2020cv00409
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Corporal Hendricks, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Murphy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00711
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adkins v. Colvin
as 3:2016cv08606
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Adkins
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Clary et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2016cv02050
Plaintiff:
Carol Clary and Charles Edward Clary
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cook et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv07007
Plaintiff:
Wanda K. Cook and Charles Edward Cook
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., Cook Incorporated, Cook Biotech, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prater et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv21168
Plaintiff:
Janet Lynn Prater and Charles Edward Prater, Sr.
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Halley et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv16900
Plaintiff:
Emma Mae Halley and Charles Edward Halley
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patterson v. McGraw et al
as 2:2013cv03825
Petitioner:
Charles Edward Patterson
Respondent:
Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., Joe Thornton and Terri Swecker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
