Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Smith v. Employees who had dealings with her case and situation involving city of Huntington, State of West Virginia, Federal branches and any and all entities that were involved with those departments
as 3:2017cv04421
Plaintiff:
Tashema D. Smith
Defendant:
Employees who had dealings with her case and situation involving city of Huntington, State of West Virginia, Federal branches and any and all entities that were involved with those departments
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Her v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2016cv10417
Plaintiff:
Betty Her
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herring v. Coloplast Corp.
as 2:2016cv05213
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Herring
Defendant:
Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herring v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv10201
Plaintiff:
Felicitas Herring
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herring et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv09649
Plaintiff:
Dorothy Herring and Roy Herring
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herring v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv05148
Plaintiff:
Regina D. Herring
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herring et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv04212
Plaintiff:
Venus Herring and Robert Herring
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herring v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv03077
Plaintiff:
Karen Herring
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herring v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29477
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Herring
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Herring v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv24772
Plaintiff:
Rebecca N. Herring
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
