Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Clements v. WV Divisions of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2019cv00172
Plaintiff:
James Allen Clements
Defendant:
Mike Francis, Prime Care Medical, WV Divisions of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv20047
Plaintiff:
Tami Fox Cooper and James Allen Cooper
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2014cv12772
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Allen and James Allen
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2013cv12300
Plaintiff:
Linda Allen and James Allen
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hemphill et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2013cv05064
Plaintiff:
Theresa Ann Hemphill and James Allen Hemphill
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv04453
Plaintiff:
Kathey Allen and James Allen
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Goll et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv07297
Plaintiff:
Julie Goll and James Allen Goll, Jr.
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
RubberLite, Inc., et al v Baychar Holdings, LLC, et al
as 3:2008cv01106
Plaintiff:
Rubberlite, Inc., Rubberlite, Inc., James Allen Mayo and others
Defendant:
Baychar Holdings, LLC, Baychar, Inc., Baychar and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Childers v. ATS Specialized, Inc., et al
as 3:2008cv00098
Plaintiff:
Heather D. Childers
Defendant:
ATS Specialized, Inc. and James Allen Kimberlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
