Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 72
Howe v. Bryson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00237
Plaintiff: Natasha Howe
Defendant: Kent Bryson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Miller et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00407
Plaintiff: Glenda Miller and Kent Miller
Defendant: American Medical Systems, Inc., C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kent v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00173
Plaintiff: Frances Kent
Defendant: C. R. Bard, Inc. and Sofradim Production SAS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Pem Properties et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2016cv09876
Plaintiff: Donald W. King
Defendant: PEM Properties, Kent Wicker, Philip Michael and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Asay et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04959
Plaintiff: Nancy Lee Asay and William Kent Asay, Jr.
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reed et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv04759
Plaintiff: Lora Reed and Kent Reed
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kent v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv03889
Plaintiff: Monica Kent
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , Secant Medical and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kent v. Ethicon, Inc.
as 2:2016cv03661
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc.
Plaintiff: Patricia Kent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sanders et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00465
Plaintiff: Karen K. Sanders and Kent Sanders
Defendant: Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Parsons v. Colvin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv14376
Plaintiff: Willie Kent Parsons
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?