Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Dunford et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv00347
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Miami-Luken, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
T.N. Dunford and Tiffany M. Dunford
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 801
James et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv00348
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Miami-Luken, Inc., SpecGx LLC and others
Plaintiff:
P. R. James and Jeffrey James
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 801
Tilley et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv00566
Plaintiff:
Mary Tilley and K. B. Tilley
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., McKesson Corporation, Richard S. Sackler and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 801
Riling et al v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv01390
Plaintiff:
Andrew G. Riling, A. P. Riling and Beverly Riling
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adkins v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv00477
Plaintiff:
David Adkins
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma, L.P. , Purdue Pharma, Inc. , The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 801
Burton et al v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv00478
Plaintiff:
Farris Burton and Town of West Hamlin
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma, L.P. , Purdue Pharma, Inc. , The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 801
The County Commission of Mingo County v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv00476
Plaintiff:
The County Commission of Mingo County
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma, L.P. , Purdue Pharma, Inc. , The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 801
The County Commission of Clay County v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 2:2018cv00413
Plaintiff:
The County Commission of Clay County
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma, L.P. , Purdue Pharma Inc. , The Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 801
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
