Cases 1 - 10 of 132
Ramirez-Torres v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Patricio Ramirez-Torres
Respondent:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ramirez-Torres v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00060
Petitioner:
Patricio Ramirez-Torres
Respondent:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ramirez-Verduzco v. Warden
as 1:2023cv00520
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Ramirez-Verduzco
Respondent:
FCI McDowell Warden and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Ramirez-Bueno v. Looney et al
as 1:2023cv00445
Plaintiff:
Ray Ramirez-Bueno
Defendant:
C. Looney, Johnson, Dinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ramirez-Verduzco v. Maruka
as 1:2021cv00357
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Ramirez-Verduzco
Respondent:
Maruka
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ramirez et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00116
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Edgar Ramirez and Marina Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramirez v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2018cv00564
Plaintiff:
Mary Ramirez
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McCarthy et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv03344
Plaintiff:
Treva McCarthy , Toni Adkison , Martha Anderson and others
Defendant:
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. , Endo Health Solutions Inc. , Astora Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ramirez v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv01494
Plaintiff:
Ofelia Ramirez
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tulk v. The Democratic National Party et al
as 2:2017cv00685
Plaintiff:
Sherry A. Tulk
Defendant:
Democratic National Party, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Donna Brazile and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
