Cases filed in the US District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia
Cases 1 - 10 of 503
Fields v. Warden
as 2:2024cv00275
Plaintiff: Jay James Fields
Defendant: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Horton v. Holzapfel
as 5:2024cv00263
Petitioner: Mandrell Horton
Respondent: Warden W. Holzapfel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Nofflett v. Warden
as 5:2024cv00251
Petitioner: Joseph Nofflett
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Conner v. Warden et al
as 1:2024cv00196
Plaintiff: John Henry Conner, Jr.
Defendant: Warden, Merick Garland and Colet Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Martinez-Turcio v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00193
Petitioner: Javier Alex Martinez-Turcio
Respondent: Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rowell v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00188
Petitioner: Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Respondent: Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rowell v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00189
Petitioner: Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Respondent: Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rowell v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00185
Petitioner: Jerry Rowell, Jr.
Respondent: Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brown v. Jividen et al
as 5:2024cv00152
Plaintiff: Anthony Brown
Defendant: Betsy Jividen, West Virginia Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Michael Francis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Osborne v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00134
Petitioner: Robert Louis Gray Osborne
Respondent: Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?