Cases 21 - 30 of 46,634
Hill v. Young et al
as 2:2024cv00737
Plaintiff:
Tameca Hill
Defendant:
Brian Young, Richard Tolentino, Alexander Verreault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00730
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Droessler, Thomas v. Dell Technologies, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Thomas James Droessler
Defendant:
Dell Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Epic Systems Corporation v. Focus Systems, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Epic Systems Corporation
Defendant:
Focus Systems, LLC, Focus Solutions, LLC, NOVO Health Technology Group, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00735
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Baynton et al
as 2:2024cv00736
Plaintiff:
Montgomery E Walker
Defendant:
Charles M Baynton, Joseph A Mclean, Justin S Ribault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzales, Antonio v. Struznski, Ashley
as 3:2024cv00392
Plaintiff:
Antonio Bernard Gonzales
Defendant:
Ashley Struznski
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rinamo, Kim et al v. Advance Fittings LLC
as 3:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Kim Rinamo, Janne Huovila and Jrgen Johansson
Defendant:
Advance Fittings LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Rinamo, Kim et al v. VNE Corporation
as 3:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Kim Rinamo, Janne Huovila and Jorgen Johansson
Defendant:
VNE Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
