Cases 41 - 50 of 63
Laconico v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al
as 5:2014cv03113
Plaintiff:
Purisima C. Laconico
Defendant:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Cal Western Reconveyance LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PURISIMA v. TROPICANA CASINO et al
as 1:2013cv02830
Plaintiff:
ANTON PURISIMA
Defendant:
TROPICANA CASINO, CITY OF ATLANTIC CITY, ATLANTIC CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PURISIMA v. REVEL ENTERTAINMENT et al
as 1:2013cv02772
Plaintiff:
ANTON PURISIMA
Defendant:
REVEL ENTERTAINMENT, SARFINO PELLEGRINO, M. W. GORANSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Romo v. Rio Bravo, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv00375
Plaintiff:
Daniel Romo
Defendant:
Rio Bravo, Inc., Dos Margaritas Grill of Gallatin, Inc., Purisima, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Purisima v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 1:2013cv01068
Plaintiff:
Anton Purisima
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security, CRST, Inc., Midlands Claim Administrators, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Rev. of Final Dec. of Sec. of HEW re: S.S. Benefits
Purisima v. Zemin et al
as 1:2012mc00755
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe, Lang Lang and others
Plaintiff:
Anton Purisima
Purisima v. Xilai et al
as 1:2012mc00748
Defendant:
Does 1-1000, People's Republic of China and Bo Xilai
Plaintiff:
Anton Purisima
Purisima v. City of New York ("City") et al
as 1:2012cv05245
Plaintiff:
Anton Purisima
Defendant:
City of New York ("City") and Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PURISIMA v. MCBRIDE
as 1:2012cv00990
Plaintiff:
ANTON PURISIMA
Defendant:
ANDRE MCBRIDE and DOES 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Purisima v. Victoria's Transportation Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv03912
Plaintiff:
Anton Purisima
Defendant:
Victoria's Transportation Co., Inc., Golden Express and Does 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
