Cases 111 - 120 of 333,075
Higgins et al
as 2:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Alyce L Higgins and Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
(SS) McVey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01418
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Rose McVey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Aguirre v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00483
Plaintiff:
Meyalli Aguirre
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Shamoee v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Juliana Shamoee
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Madsen v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 4:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Jerry Madsen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
(SS) McVey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024at00630
Plaintiff:
Chelsea McVey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lorenzetta Whitfield v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04136
Plaintiff:
Lorenzetta Whitfield
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Lamone Lacy v. Martin O'Malley
as 2:2024cv04126
Plaintiff:
Lamone Lacey
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Eric R. Decker v. Martin O Malley
as 8:2024cv01082
Plaintiff:
Eric R Decker
Defendant:
Martin O Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
SHIELDS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 3:2024cv00215
Plaintiff:
TINA SHIELDS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
