Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Gomez-Camarena v. GARLAND et al
as 2:2021cv11280
Defendant:
Immigration Review, Executive Office of, MERRICK GARLAND and U.S. Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Juan Antonio Gomez-Camarena
Day v. Michigan, State of et al
as 5:2021cv10991
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, ICE, Michigan, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Dillia M. Day
Gifford v. Department of Justice
as 2:2021mc50496
Plaintiff:
Alexander R. Gifford
Defendant:
Department of Justice
People of the Temple No. 13 v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2021cv10328
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice / DEA, Oakland County Pros Office, Michigan, State of and others
Plaintiff:
People of the Temple No. 13
Gifford v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 1:2020cv12889
Plaintiff:
Alexander R. Gifford
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States Department of Justice
Shafiq v. Department of Justice
as 2:2020cv10213
Plaintiff:
Hatim Shafiq
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Cain v. United States Department of Justice et al
as 2:2019cv12483
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service and United States Department of Justice
Plaintiff:
Derrick Cain
Doe v. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 1:2019cv00288
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of Homeland Security, Executive Office for Immigration Review and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Oudom Xayphannha and Holly Xayphannha
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Gun Owners of America, Inc. et al v. Barr et al
as 1:2018cv01429
Plaintiff:
Tim Harmsen, Rachel Malone, Jacob Lilley and others
Defendant:
Thomas E. Brandon, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, United States Department of Justice and others
Petitioner:
Gun Owners of California, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Eva Reyes, et al v. Department of Justice
as 2:2018cv10678
Plaintiff:
Eva Reyes and Gerald Stevens
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
