Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Jones v. 1Life Healthcare, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv06819
Plaintiff:
Thomas Jones
Defendant:
1Life Healthcare, Inc., Amir Dan Rubin, Paul R. Auvil and others
Daniel Gonzalez v. Department (Bureau) of Real Es, et al
as 21-15696
Defendant / Appellee:
WAYNE S. BELL, WILLIAM E. MORAN, JEFF DAVI and others
Defendant:
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, as successor by merger to Chase Home Finance, LLC, HSBC MORTGAGE SERVICES, INC., HARDY, Senior Deputy and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL GONZALEZ
USA v. Adam Jones
as 21-1487
Defendant / Appellant:
ADAM QUINCY JONES, aka Matthew Thomas Jones
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Craig Jones v. Steven Mnuchin, et al
as 21-10816
Defendant / Appellee:
THE UNITED STATES, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, in his official capacity as Secretary of State, STEVEN MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CRAIG THOMAS JONES
Clayton Jones v. Jeanette McBride
as 21-6218
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLAYTON THOMAS JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
JEANETTE W. MCBRIDE
Clayton Jones v. State of South Carolina
as 21-6179
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA AND ITS AGENTS, individually and officially
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLAYTON T. JONES and CLAYTON THOMAS JONES
US v. Corey Jones
as 21-6353
Defendant / Appellant:
COREY THOMAS JONES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Jones et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank
as 1:2020cv05217
Plaintiff:
Craig T. Jones, P.C. and Craig Thomas Jones
Defendant:
JPMorgan Chase Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jack Kimm v. Martin Brannan, et al
as 20-17135
Defendant / Appellee:
RAYBURN EVANS, COUNTY OF LA PAZ, a municipal entity, THOMAS JONES and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JACK KIMM
USA v. Thomas Jones
as 20-1405
Defendant / Appellant:
THOMAS JONES
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
