Other Statutes Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 359
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. BLM, et al
as 23-35227
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, DEFENDERS OF WILDLIFE, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH and others
Defendant / Appellee: BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC., ARCTIC SLOPE REGIONAL CORPORATION, NORTH SLOPE BOROUGH and others
Amicus Curiae: LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF ALASKA, LISA MURKOWSKI, United States Senator, MARY SATTLER PELTOLA, United States Representative and others
Legend Lake Property Owners Association Inc v. United States Department of The Interior et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00480
Plaintiff: Legend Lake Property Owners Association Inc
Defendant: United States Department of The Interior, Deb Haaland, Bureau of Indian Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Montana Environmental Information Center, et al v. Westmoreland Rosebud Mining LLC, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-36002
Plaintiff / Appellee: MONTANA ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION CENTER, INDIAN PEOPLE'S ACTION, 350 MONTANA and others
Defendant / Appellee: DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Department of the Interior, U. S. OFFICE OF SURFACE MINING RECLAMATION AND ENFORCEMENT, an agency within the U. S. Department of the Interior, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, a federal agency and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant: WESTMORELAND ROSEBUD MINING LLC and INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL 400
Kerwin v. Starbucks Corporation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv12761
Petitioner: Regional Director Elizabeth K. Kerwin
Respondent: Starbucks Corporation
Amicus Curiae: Workers United
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
McMillian v. NYC Taxi and Limousine Commission
as 22-2772
Plaintiff / Appellant: James McMillian
Defendant / Appellee: NYC Taxi and Limousine Commission, Carmen Rojas, Asst. Commissioner of Human Resources, Chief/Captain Eldwrage Joseph and others
Defendant: Prior Dept. Chief Donald Sobers
Walter Rosales, et al v. USDOI, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-16196
Plaintiff / Appellant: WALTER J. ROSALES, LOUIS AYHULE GOMEZ, ESTATE OF KAREN TOGGERY and others
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DAVID BERNHARDT, Secretary of the Interior, AMY DUTSCHKE, Regional Director, BIA and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 22-15809
Plaintiff / Appellant: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, MARICOPA AUDUBON SOCIETY and SIERRA CLUB, Grand Canyon Chapter
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, AURELIA SKIPWITH, in her official capacity as the Director of FWS and others
Center for Biological Diversity, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
as 22-15928
Plaintiff / Appellee: CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, MARICOPA AUDUBON SOCIETY and SIERRA CLUB, Grand Canyon Chapter
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Secretary of the Interior, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, AURELIA SKIPWITH, in her official capacity as the Director of FWS and others
In re: Waseem Daker
as 22-11983
Petitioner: In re: WASEEM DAKER
Respondent: COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACK KOON, ROBERT TOOLE and others
David F. Stix, Jr., et al v. Ernest Conant, et al
as 22-15603
Plaintiff: CITY OF FERNLEY
Intervenor Plaintiff: DAVID F. STIX, Jr. and DEENA E. EDMONSTON
Defendant / Appellee: ERNEST A. CONANT, Regional Director of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, COMMISSIONER UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION and UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: PYRAMID LAKE PAIUTE TRIBE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?