Cases 31 - 40 of 316
Cricket Wireless LLC et al v. AT&T Intellectual Property II, L.P. et al
as 0:2020cv62163
Defendant:
Noel Brown, Noelthetechexperts, LLC and AT&T Intellectual Property II, L.P.
Plaintiff:
AT&T Mobility LLC and Cricket Wireless LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv09038
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2020cv61983
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv01389
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00400
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Hargray Communications Group Inc
as 9:2020cv01361
Plaintiff:
AT&T Mobility LLC
Defendant:
Hargray Communications Group Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151
Ian Vianu, et al v. AT&T Mobility LLC
as 20-15446
Defendant / Appellant:
AT&T MOBILITY LLC
Plaintiff / Appellee:
IAN VIANU and IRINA BUKCHIN
Emmanuel Agbara v. AT&T Mobility LLC, et al
as 20-7023
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Emmanuel Agbara
Defendant / Appellee:
AT&T Mobility LLC, also known as AT&T U.S. Mobility, also known as AT&T Wireless, also known as AT&T and Evelyn Onyenyi Okoji
AT&T Capital Services, Inc. et al v. Geisenberger et al
as 1:2019cv02238
Plaintiff:
The Ohio Bell Telephone Company, AT&T Mobility Supply, LLC, AT&T NCWS Holdings, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Richard J. Geisenberger, Brenda R. Mayrack and Michelle M. (Whitaker) Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
