Cases 41 - 50 of 51
In re: Bernard Jerry-El
as 14-2940
Petitioner:
In re: BERNARD CARTER JERRY-EL
Defendant - Respondent:
GEORGE PETSOCK
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
In re: Robert Suto
as 14-1807
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT SUTO
Defendant - Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
Lagendyk v. Rucker et al
as 0:2014cv00789
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Lagendyk , Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund , Erie County Employees Retirement System and others
Defendant:
Robert A. Rucker, Timothy Clayton and Tile Shop Holdings, Inc.
Movant:
Darby Maclennan and The TTS Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Puerta v. Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. et al
as 0:2014cv00786
Plaintiff:
Craig Puerta , Beaver County Employees' Retirement Fund and Erie County Employees Retirement System
Defendant:
Tile Shop Holdings, Inc. , Robert A. Rucker, The Tile Shop, Inc. and others
Movant:
Darby Maclennan
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
In re: Bernard Jerry-El
as 14-1569
Petitioner:
In re: BERNARD CARTER JERRY-EL
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
In re: Jamie Brown
as 13-3848
Petitioner:
In re: JAMIE BROWN
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
In re: Eric Miskovitch
as 12-2649
Petitioner:
In re: ERIC M. MISKOVITCH
Respondent:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY BEAVER COUNTY
Beaver County Retirement Board v. LCA-Vision Inc., et al
as 09-4526
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BEAVER COUNTY RETIREMENT BOARD, Individually and on behalf of all other similary situated
Defendant - Appellee:
LCA-VISION INC., E. ANTHONY WOODS, STEVEN C. STRAUS and others
Doe v. Shurtleff et al
as 1:2008cv00064
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Mark Shurtleff, Beaver County Sheriff, Beaver County Prosecutor and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Beaver County Retirement Board v. LCA-Vision Inc. et al
as 1:2007cv00750
Plaintiff:
Beaver County Retirement Board
Defendant:
LCA-Vision Inc., E. Anthony Woods, Steven C. Straus and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
