Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 1,458
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau et al v. STRATFS, LLC et al
as 1:2024mc20262
Defendant: STRATFS, LLC, Strategic Client Support, LLC, Anchor Client Services, LLC and others
Plaintiff: Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, The People of The State of New York by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754 Receiver of Property in Different Districts
Diane Owens, et al v. FirstEnergy Corporation, et al
as 23-3940
Not Classified By Court: In re: FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: DIANE OWENS, CHANA FRAND, CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant / Appellant: FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION, STEVEN E. STRAH, K. JON TAYLOR and others
Diane Owens, et al v. FirstEnergy Corporation, et al
as 23-3947
Not Classified By Court: In re: FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: DIANE OWENS, CHANA FRAND, CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant: FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellant: JOHN JUDGE
Diane Owens, et al v. FirstEnergy Corporation, et al
as 23-3943
Not Classified By Court: In re: FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: DIANE OWENS, CHANA FRAND, CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant: FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellant: JAMES F. PEARSON
Diane Owens, et al v. FirstEnergy Corporation, et al
as 23-3945
Not Classified By Court: In re: FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: DIANE OWENS, CHANA FRAND, CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant: FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellant: CHARLES E. JONES
Diane Owens, et al v. FirstEnergy Corporation, et al
as 23-3946
Not Classified By Court: In re: FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION SECURITIES LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: DIANE OWENS, CHANA FRAND, CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM and others
Defendant: FIRSTENERGY CORPORATION
Defendant / Appellant: DONALD SCHNEIDER
Industrial Energy Consumers of America, et al v. FERC
as 23-1334
Petitioner: Industrial Energy Consumers of America, Resale Power Group of Iowa, Coalition of MISO Transmission Customers and others
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
People of the State of California v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv05448
Plaintiff: The People of the State of California, People of the State of California, Commonwealth of Kentucky and others
Defendant: Meta Platforms, Inc., Instagram, LLC, Meta Payments, Inc. and others
Interested Party: Conghua Yan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. OMNICARE, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv01326
Plaintiff: THE STATE OF INDIANA, THE STATE OF GEORGIA, THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Defendant: PHARMERICA CORPORATION, NCS HEALTHCARE, INC., NEIGHBORCARE, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
as 2:2018md02836
Defendant: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Glenmark Pharmaceuticals, Ltd., MSP Singapore Co. LLC and others
Plaintiff: FWK Holdings, LLC, HEB Grocery Company L.P., All End Payer Plaintiffs and others
In Re: In Re: Zetia (Ezetimibe) Antitrust Litigation
Interested Party: Zydus Pharmaceuticals (USA) Inc., Apotex USA, Inc. and Apotex Corp., WILSON SONSINI GOODRICH & ROSATI, P.C. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff: KPH Healthcare Services, Inc., McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Petitioner: AmerisourceBergen Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, H.D. Smith, LLC and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Giant Eagle, Inc., Burlington Drug Company, Inc., Dakota Drug, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?