Cases 71 - 80 of 221
BLOOM v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al
as 2:2020cv01386
Plaintiff:
EDWARD BLOOM
Defendant:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., CHASE MORTGAGE HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv01779
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv01695
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv01524
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Gilbert v. Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC et al
as 8:2020cv01752
Defendant:
The Law Offices of Popkin & Rosaler, P.A. and Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Kathy Gilbert
Not Classified By Court:
Peter J. Grilli
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03003
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02134
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Callahan, II v. Kass Shuler, P.A. et al
as 8:2020cv01753
Defendant:
Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC and Kass Shuler, P.A.
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Callahan, II
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Dennis Raybould v. Rushmore Loan Management, et al
as 20-35557
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENNIS RAYBOULD
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. BANK, N.A., not in its individual capacity but solely as Trustee for the RMAC Trust, Series 2016-CTT, whose address is 60 Livingston Avenue, St. Paul, MN 55107-2292, its successors and assigns, (Assignee, RMAC TRUST, SERIES 2016-CTT, RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv03742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
