Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 29,099
In re: Naturalization Ceremony 06/25/2024
as 3:2024mc80145
Not Yet Classified: Leonardo Mir Norouzi, Luis Alberto Angeles, Humberto Topete and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04951
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04188
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
E. K. B., et al. v. City of Azusa, et al.
as 24-3667
Plaintiff: E. K. B., a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem Nakisha Mitchell and NAKISHA MITCHELL, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Jerome Rory Barber
Defendant: CITY OF AZUSA, a public entity, MICHAEL BERTELSON, a public employee, DAVID AGUILAR, a public employee previously known as Doe 1 and others
US v. Johnny Jordan
as 24-6560
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: JOHNNY EARL JORDAN, a/k/a June June
USA v. Tyler Eugene
as 24-2085
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: TYLER EUGENE, a/k/a Lucc
VICKY ENTERPRISES, INC., v. ASR Group International, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv21386
Plaintiff: VICKY ENTERPRISES, INC., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and VICKY ENTERPRISES, INC.,
Defendant: ASR Group International, Inc., AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING, INC., Domino Foods, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
In re: Erick Hobbs
as 24-1529
Petitioner: In re: ERICK RAHUMID HOBBS, a/k/a Eric Muhammad
Flesch v. Richter, et al.
as 24-3622
Plaintiff: CODY JOSEPH VERNON FLESCH
Defendant: BETHANY RICHTER, MORGAN K. LIX and HOJAE CHUNG
David Hough et al v. Ryan Carroll et al
as 2:2024cv02886
Plaintiff: David Hough, Mouloud Hocine, Jennifer Lehmkuhl Hill and others
Defendant: Ryan Carroll, Max K. Day, Max O. Day and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?