Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 412
MATA v. BETTER DEBT SOLUTIONS LLC; et al
as 8:2024cv02048
Plaintiff: DANNY MATA
Defendant: LENDVIA LLC; and BETTER DEBT SOLUTIONS LLC;
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
MATA v. Better Debt Solutions LLC et al
as 8:2024cv02050
Defendant: Lendvia LLC and Better Debt Solutions LLC
Plaintiff: DANNY MATA
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Mata-Martinez v. Garland
as 24-4224
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Petitioner: ESTEBAN FULGENCIO MATA-MARTINEZ
United States of America v. Olivo (Martinez)
as 24-1699
Defendant: PEDRO OLIVO, JOAQUIN CASTILLO, MICHAEL MARTINEZ and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
USA v. Mata
as 24-10443
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Roy Mata
Mata v. United States of America
as 24-1264
Petitioner: JOSE LUIS MATA
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC v. Norstar Club Inc et al
as 4:2024cv01616
Plaintiff: G&G Closed Circuit Events, LLC
Defendant: Norstar Club Inc doing business as The Other Bar and Virginia A. Mata doing business as The Other Bar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed Question: Fed Communications Act of 1
Mata Castillo v. Garland
as 24-60154
Petitioner: Ofelia Mata Castillo, Keyri Michelle Sorto Mata and Xiomara Cristal Sorto Mata
Respondent: Merrick Garland, U.S. Attorney General
Green, et al. v. McNamara, et al.
as 24-1660
Plaintiff: K'AUN GREEN, an individual
Defendant: MARK MCNAMARA, in his individual capacity as a law enforcement officer for the City of San Jose, CITY OF SAN JOSE, a municipal corporation and ANTHONY MATA, in his individual capacity as a law enforcement officer for City of San Jose
Mercado Medina, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1137
Petitioner: ROGELIO MERCADO MEDINA, ELIA MATA MANCILLA, EMILY MERCADO MATA and others
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?