Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 9,265
HAKAMI v. GARLAND et al
as 1:2024cv01854
Plaintiff: AHMED ABDULLAH A HAKAMI
Defendant: MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
LIU LAYER v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2024cv01841
Plaintiff: SHANSHAN LIU LAYER
Defendant: ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, UR MENDOZA JADDOU and MERRICK B. GARLAND
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Morgan v. Group Health Plan Inc.
as 0:2024cv02465
Plaintiff: Ashley N. Morgan
Defendant: Group Health Plan Inc. doing business as Park Nicollet Health Care Products
United States of America v. Green (Reese)
as 24-1652
Defendant: WILLIAM N. GREEN, CHRISTOPHER E. REESE, Sealed Defendant 1 and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01298
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
KHALEEL v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv01802
Plaintiff: ASIF N. KHALEEL
Defendant: ANTONY J. BLINKEN, RENA BITTER, ANDREW SCHOFER and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Badger v. City of Cortland
as 24-1644
Plaintiff: JAMES M. BADGER, MARCUS A. BENJAMIN, SEAN P. BYRNES and others
Defendant: CITY OF CORTLAND
Benshoof v. United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Seattle
as 24-3765
Petitioner: KURT BENSHOOF
Respondent: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, SEATTLE
Interested Party: SEATTLE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, A.R.W., by and through his father Kurt Benshoof, NATHAN CLIBER and others
Roy v. Gorevic et al
as 1:2024cv04651
Plaintiff: Anand Roy
Defendant: Jason N. Gorevic, Mala Murthy, J. Eric Evans and others
Timothy Hatton v. James P. Hanlon, et al
as 24-2037
Petitioner: TIMOTHY N. HATTON
Respondent: JAMES P. HANLON, JANE MAGNUS-STINSON and MATTHEW P. BROOKMAN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?