Other Statutes Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 91
GLENDALE ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2024cv01244
Plaintiff: GLENDALE ADVENTIST MEDICAL CENTER, SAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, CASTLE MEDICAL CENTER and others
Not Yet Classified: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., et al. v. City of San Diego, et al.
as 24-472
Plaintiff / Appellant: FIREARMS POLICY COALITION, INC., CALIFORNIA GUN RIGHTS FOUNDATION and SAN DIEGO COUNTY GUN OWNERS PAC
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF SAN DIEGO, IMPERIAL COUNTY, ALAMEDA COUNTY and others
Mullin v. County of Santa Clara, et al.
as 24-453
Plaintiff / Appellant: TYGHE JAMES MULLIN
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA and SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Ortega v. County of Santa Clara, et al.
as 23-1831
Plaintiff / Appellant: CARLOS A. ORTEGA
Defendant / Appellee: COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA, EDWARD FLORES, Chief of Corrections, DAVID SEPUL-VEDA, Complex Commander Captain and others
Regents of University of California et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv05211
Defendant: United States Department of Homeland Security, Elaine Duke, Former Federal Immigration and Homeland Security Officials and others
Plaintiff: Regents of University of California, Janet Napolitano and UC Regents
Petitioner: City of Seattle, U.S. Conference of Mayors, City of West Hollywood and others
Amicus Curiae: Services, Immigrant Rights, and Education Network, West Contra Costa Unified School District, Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Ou-Young v. County of Santa Clara We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023mc80222
Plaintiff: Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant: County of Santa Clara, Jeffrey F. Rosen, John Chase and others
Alliance Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 23-10362
Plaintiff / Appellee: Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, American Association of Pro-Life Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Pediatricians and others
Defendant / Appellant: Food & Drug Administration, Robert M. Califf, Commissioner of Food and Drugs, Janet Woodcock, M.D., in her official capacity as Principal Deputy Commissioner, U.S. Food and Drug Administration and others
Intervenor: Danco Laboratories, L.L.C.
Amicus Curiae: State of New York, Ethics and Public Policy Center, Local Governments and others
Not Classified By Court: 240 Members of Congress and Human Coalition
ALAMEDA COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER et al v. BECERRA
as 1:2023cv00690
Plaintiff: ALAMEDA COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER doing business as HIGHLAND HOSPITAL, COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OF THE MONTEREY PENINSULA, CONTRA COSTA HEALTH SERVICES doing business as CONTRA COSTA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER and others
Defendant: XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc. et al v. City of San Diego et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00400
Plaintiff: Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc., California Gun Rights Foundation and San Diego County Gun Owners PAC
Defendant: City of San Diego, County of Imperial, County of Alameda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
City and County of San Francisco v. Azar II et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02405
Plaintiff: City and County of San Francisco
Defendant: Roger Severino, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar II and others
Petitioner: State of California, by and through Attorney General Xavier Becerra
Interested Party: County of Santa Clara
Amicus Curiae: Service Employees International Union, Local 1021, Institute for Policy Integrity, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 1156 Administrative Procedure Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?