Cases 191 - 200 of 47,829
King v. Dauphin County et al
as 1:2024cv01520
Defendant:
Lower Allen Police Department, Cumberland County and Dauphin County
Plaintiff:
Nathan Lamont King, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Combs v. Petrucci et al
as 3:2024cv01521
Defendant:
County of Lackawanna/City of Scranton, James Petrucci, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Combs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01519
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01524
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03071
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Semerod v. Siko et al
as 4:2024cv01165
Defendant:
City of Shamokin, Chief Raymond Siko, Patrolman Benjamin Busko and others
Plaintiff:
Krystal Semerod
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Bognatz v. Hopkins et al
as 3:2024cv01168
Defendant:
Brian Bognatz, Brian Rock, Jessica Hopkins and others
Plaintiff:
Heather Leigh Bognatz and Heather L. Snow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PERRETTA v. CONSIGLIO et al
as 3:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
DAVID PERRETTA
Defendant:
MICHAEL SAPIENZA, RICHARD CONSIGLIO and PETER WEEKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv03524
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
