Cases 31 - 40 of 78
Lamberson v. Wytheville Police Department et al
as 7:2018cv00534
Defendant:
Board of Supervisors of Wythe County, Virginia, Gerald E. Mabe, II, Scot S. Farthing and others
Plaintiff:
David Allen Lamberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lamberson v. Wytheville Police Department et al
as 3:2018cv00677
Defendant:
Board of Supervisors of Wythe County, Virginia, Gerald E. Mabe, II, Scot S. Farthing and others
Plaintiff:
David Allen Lamberson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Matousek v. Towne Bank NC/VA
as 2:2018cv00501
Plaintiff:
Susan Matousek
Defendant:
Towne Bank NC/VA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
GEM RAM, LLC v. Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Round Hill, Virginia et al
as 1:2013cv00861
Plaintiff:
GEM RAM, LLC
Defendant:
Board of Zoning Appeals of the Town of Round Hill, Virginia , William Heston , Robert Kinsely and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00811
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Willis v. Blevins et al
as 3:2013cv00278
Plaintiff:
Peter Willis
Defendant:
Kenneth Blevins, Jr. , Kenneth Blevins, Sr. , Edward O'Shea, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
