Cases 41 - 50 of 87
Ogden v. CDI Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv00281
Plaintiff:
Martin Ogden
Defendant:
CDI Corporation, Tracy A Miller, Caroline Larsen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Malnes v. Flagstaff, City of et al
as 3:2015cv08113
Plaintiff:
Brian Edward Malnes
Defendant:
Flagstaff, City of , Michelle D'Andrea , Robert Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jacobson et al v. United States Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2014cv02485
Plaintiff:
Leesa Jacobson and Peter Ragan
Defendant:
United States Department of Homeland Security, United States Customs and Border Protection, United States Office of Border Patrol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kimm v. Brannan et al
as 2:2014cv01966
Plaintiff:
Jack Kimm
Defendant:
Martin Brannan, Rayburn Evans, Samuel Verderman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeAnda v. SECO Packing Company LLC et al
as 2:2014cv00373
Plaintiff:
Martin DeAnda, Sr. and Myrna DeAnda
Defendant:
SECO Packing Company LLC , Hector Manuel Madueno , Somerton, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv08249
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Flunder v. Arizona Board of Regents et al
as 2:2013cv01893
Plaintiff:
Gerald L Flunder, Jr.
Defendant:
Arizona Board of Regents, Michael M Crow, Unknown Crow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01677
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Gilford v. Quartzsite, Town of et al
as 2:2013cv00468
Plaintiff:
Douglas C Gilford
Defendant:
Quartzsite, Town of, Al Johnson, Rhonda Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
