Cases 51 - 60 of 18,496
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Gydesen v. Miller et al
as 1:2024cv00216
Plaintiff:
Morris Gydesen
Defendant:
Brian Miller, Kevin Madden, Troy Waidelich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brown v. National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
as 3:2024cv00426
Plaintiff:
Heidi Davonne Brown
Defendant:
National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00884
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
RHODES et al v. JEFFERSONVILLE BUILDING COMMISSIONER et al
as 4:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
GLENN S. RHODES and SHARON YOUNG
Defendant:
JEFFERSON BUILDING COMMISSION, JEFFERSON ENGINEERS OFFICE, MUNICIPALITY AND PUBLIC UTILITIES OF JEFFERSONVILLE INDIANA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
CRAIG v. CRAIG
as 4:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
HOLDEN CRAIG
Defendant:
GRETCHEN CRAIG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00874
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
