Cases 61 - 70 of 11,236
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00312
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Manno v. McRae et al
as 4:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Dr. Francis A.M. Manno
Defendant:
Dr. Susan McRae, Karen Oppelt, Members of the IACUC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
HENDERSON v. SHANLEY et al
as 1:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
JEREMY LAMOND HENDERSON
Defendant:
ASHLIE SHANLEY, NATHANIEL KNUST, VAN WORTH SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Walker v. Genesis Project 1 Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00369
Plaintiff:
Michael V. Walker
Defendant:
Genesis Project 1 Inc. and Sheila Ford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ragland v. NC Division of Employment Security
as 5:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Kimarlo Ragland
Defendant:
NC Division of Employment Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Parks v. Raleigh Police Department
as 5:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Antonio Cortez Parks
Defendant:
Raleigh Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOLSEY-HYMAN v. CITY OF DURHAM et al
as 1:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Monique Holsey-Hyman
Defendant:
CITY OF DURHAM, Kimberly Rehberg, Mark Anthony Middleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boyd v. Municipality of Robersonville et al
as 4:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
S. Boyd
Defendant:
Municipality of Robersonville, Leon Bonner, Cynthia Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
