Cases 91 - 100 of 130
Lancaster v. Todd et al
as 1:2016cv00200
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lancaster
Defendant:
J. Todd, Artrip, B. Kunkle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brattain v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv05667
Petitioner:
Todd Andrew Brattain
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lesane v. The United States Government Federal Bureau Of Prisons (FBOP) et al
as 1:2016cv00101
Plaintiff:
Eric Jamel Lesane
Defendant:
The United States Government Federal Bureau Of Prisons (FBOP), The SaFariland Group, Charles E. Samules and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Runyon v. WV Regional Jail Authority et al
as 2:2016cv01364
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Runyon
Defendant:
WV Regional Jail Authority, Anthony Leonard and Staff at SCRJ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. USA
as 1:2016cv00060
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Patrick Franklin Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Andrew v. FCI Morgantown et al
as 3:2016cv00011
Plaintiff:
Bryson Andrew
Defendant:
FCI Morgantown, Federal Prison Health Services, Patrica Corbin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Andrew v. FCI Morgantown et al
as 5:2016cv00008
Plaintiff:
Bryson Andrew
Defendant:
FCI Morgantown, Federal Prison Health Services, Patricia Corbin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. United States of America
as 1:2015cv12722
Petitioner:
Andrew Carlesta King
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miller v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2015cv01581
Plaintiff:
Andrew Miller
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein , David Ballard , Margaret Clifford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Chicarelli v. Warden, North Central Regional Jail
as 3:2015cv00076
Petitioner:
Andrew L. Chicarelli
Respondent:
Warden, North Central Regional Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
