Cases 91 - 100 of 22,233
Ledkins v. Jackson et al
as 3:2024cv03027
Plaintiff:
Paul Eugene Ledkins
Defendant:
Mayor Jerry Jackson, Jeremy Ragland, Mitch Magness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. McLean
as 4:2024cv04025
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wayne Dale Smith, Jr and (Sam) Lil
Defendant:
Joan McLean, Officer Joe Doe and Officer Todd Tallant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Does
as 4:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Corey L Ellis
Defendant:
Does Mark/Scott, Owners, Loose Change Coin Laundry; Ty, Loose Change Coin Laundry; Employee, Loose Change Coin Laundry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Poinsett County Jail
as 3:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Jacob Kyle Campbell
Defendant:
Poinsett County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Poinsett County Jail
as 3:2024cv00086
Plaintiff:
Larry Alvin Brown
Defendant:
Poinsett County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ralston v. Rex
as 5:2024cv05075
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Wayne Ralston
Defendant:
Sheriff Jay Cantrell, Former Sheriff Tim Helder and Patrol Officer Rex
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Titus v. World Book et al
as 6:2024cv06039
Plaintiff:
Michael Titus
Defendant:
World Book, Nike Distribution Centers, Craig Mack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00058
Plaintiff:
George Eli Brown
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Ellis v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Corey L Ellis
Defendant:
Eric Higgins and Lucky 8 TV Productions
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Counice et al
as 4:2024cv00449
Plaintiff:
Corey L Ellis
Defendant:
Bessie L Counice, Justin Minor and Spears
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
