Cases 101 - 110 of 22,890
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Florence v. Red Eagle Work Center et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Derrick L. Florence
Defendant:
Red Eagle Work Center and Norteshia S. Honaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Battle v. Headley et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00212
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dentray Battle
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jacoby v. Dr. Fish et al
as 7:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Dr. Fish, Ms. Perkins and Ms. Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Bennett et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Eddie Jerome Kelly
Defendant:
Lt. Bennett, Joseph H. Headley and Warden Cargill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rojas v. Neely
as 7:2024cv00415
Petitioner:
Margiee Vanessa Bonilla Rojas
Respondent:
Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garrett v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv08007
Petitioner:
Adaisha Garrett
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Fair v. Malloy et al
as 2:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Lynn Fair
Defendant:
Lt. Kevin Malloy, Capt. Surles, Lt. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bush v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv08008
Petitioner:
Daymon Maurice Bush
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
