Cases 111 - 120 of 30,459
ELLIS v. GORDER
as 1:2024cv00371
Petitioner:
KENNETH JERMAINE ELLIS
Respondent:
R. VAN GORDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
TURNER v. NAPHACARE CCS et al
as 1:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
JAMES JONATHAN TURNER
Defendant:
NAPHACARE CCS, FORSYTH COUNTY JAIL and NURSE JERNEGEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCCRAE v. RUSH et al
as 1:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL MCCRAE, III
Defendant:
TAMARA RUSH, WARDEN PARSON, JERNIGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPRAUVE v. UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
as 1:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
JON C. SPRAUVE
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICIALS AT DURHAM COUNTY DETENTION CENTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amadi v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02060
Petitioner:
Okechukwu Desmond Amadi
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Collins v. Barnes et al
as 5:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Derrick D. Collins
Defendant:
FNU Barnes, FNU Isenhour and John Does 1 through 5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. McMillian et al
as 5:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Albert Anderson
Defendant:
FNU McMillian, Alexander Correctional Institution, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Ruff et al
as 5:2024ct03102
Plaintiff:
Andrew Reginald Willis
Defendant:
Mark C. Ruff, City Of Fayetteville, Sgt. James Yowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heskett v. Unknown Defendant
as 5:2024ct03101
Plaintiff:
Curtis Daniel Heskett
Defendant:
Unknown Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pavkovich v. USA
as 5:2024cv00112
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Ben Pavkovich
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
