Cases 141 - 150 of 22,890
Curry v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv08002
Petitioner:
Ameche Lashuan Curry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Neal v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv08011
Petitioner:
John Lee Neal
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McNeal v. McClain et al
as 5:2024cv00472
Petitioner:
Jonathan Marcel McNeal
Respondent:
Antonio McClain and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brocato v. Hamm
as 7:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Ryan Anthony Brocato
Defendant:
Hamm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moton v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv08004
Petitioner:
Christopher Moton
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Driver v. Coaling Fire Chief et al
as 7:2024cv00310
Plaintiff:
Joseph Earl Driver
Defendant:
Coaling Fire Chief and Coaling Fireman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Young v. Morgan County Jail
as 5:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Jahbarie Azyron Young
Defendant:
Morgan County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frazier v. Montgomery County Jail et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Quintin Frazier
Defendant:
Montgomery County Jail and T. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv08012
Petitioner:
DeAnte Marquise Ford
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
McLemore v. Holt
as 1:2024cv00048
Plaintiff:
Wesley McLemore
Defendant:
Kathy Holt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
