Cases 161 - 170 of 30,579
BANKS v. LIEBEL et al
as 2:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
DEVON BANKS
Defendant:
DAVID LIEBEL, J. FAUST, D. WALKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chupp v. Smiley et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Glenn D Chupp
Defendant:
Smiley, Kenneth Watts, Todd Rokita and others
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TINDALL v. USA
as 1:2024cv00549
Petitioner:
GARY TINDALL, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
STONE-DUNLAP v. STATE OF INDIANA
as 1:2024cv00551
Petitioner:
ERIC STONE-DUNLAP
Respondent:
STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DUVALL v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00100
Petitioner:
TAMI LAINE DUVALL
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WALTON v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE et al
as 1:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
BLAKE WALTON
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE, JAIL COMMANDER, A. FENI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Templeton
as 3:2024cv00394
Plaintiff:
Kyle Chandler
Defendant:
Evan J Templeton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Soto
as 3:2024cv00393
Plaintiff:
Kyle Chandler
Defendant:
Michael Soto and J Mathey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickman v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2024cv00395
Plaintiff:
Anthony S Hickman and Anthony Scott Hickman
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Eric J Holcomb, Todd Rokita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kampf v. Heeg et al
as 3:2024cv00268
Plaintiff:
Robert Kampf
Defendant:
Ron Heeg and Quality Correctional Care LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
