Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Alabama
Cases 11 - 20 of 23,120
Crowell v. Rooker (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00586
Defendant: G. Rooker
Plaintiff: Rodriquez Crowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Crabtree et al
as 5:2024cv01247
Defendant: Barr, Allen, T Schult and others
Plaintiff: Lutha James Robinson, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McQueen v. Tucker et al
as 5:2024cv01241
Defendant: Diana K, Katina Crossby and Ebony C Tucker
Plaintiff: Marcus DeWayne McQueen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv08021
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Demontaye Lamar Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Posey v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01232
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Daniel Posey, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Allen v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv01233
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Robert Elijah Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Tarabein v. Scott et al
as 1:2024cv00328
Defendant: Justin Roller, Joseph Simmons, Sinan Kalayoglu and others
Plaintiff: Rassan M. Tarabein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kyles v. USA
as 1:2024cv00345
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Paul Kyles, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Moreta v. Neely
as 7:2024cv01228
Petitioner: Virginia Garcia Moreta
Defendant: Kimberly Neely
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Smith v. United States of America (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00580
Defendant: United States of America
Plaintiff: Marcus Rashawn Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?