Cases 31 - 40 of 1,681
Hawkins v. Fountain, et al.
as 5:2024ct03048
Plaintiff:
Justin Hawkins
Defendant:
Unnamed Defendant, Robert Fountain, Fred Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BEVERLEY v. BREEZE
as 1:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
JAMES BEVERLEY
Defendant:
DURHAM CO and WILLIAM BREEZE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ali v. Sledge et al
as 5:2024ct03080
Plaintiff:
Abdulkadir Sharif Ali
Defendant:
Wendy Sledge, Kenneth Washington, William Riddick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeBold v. Stocks et al
as 5:2024ct03054
Plaintiff:
Antoine A. DeBold
Defendant:
Sergeant Stocks, C/O Williams, C/O Everrett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Brammer
as 5:2024ct03051
Plaintiff:
Quashon Treyvaughn Williams
Defendant:
Officer Brammer and Unknown Pert Team Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. USA
as 3:2024cv00374
Petitioner:
Marvin Maurice Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Williams v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2024hc02048
Petitioner:
Chris Shawn Williams and Christopher Shawn Williams
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lozano-Bustos v. Heckard
as 5:2024hc02036
Petitioner:
William Lozano-Bustos
Respondent:
Warden Katina Heckard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Price v. Atrium Health et al
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Robert Price
Defendant:
Atrium Health, Southern Health Partners, Ashley Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Harnett County Detention Center
as 5:2024ct03046
Plaintiff:
William Kirk Johnson
Defendant:
Harnett County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
