Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 31 - 40 of 30,698
DOE v. KNOX COUNTY SHERRIFF DEPT.
as 2:2024cv00143
Plaintiff: DETRIC O. DOE
Defendant: KNOX COUNTY SHERRIFF DEPT.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SCROGHAM v. DUNAWAY et al
as 4:2024cv00084
Plaintiff: MICHAEL JAMES SCROGHAM
Defendant: DUNAWAY, TEVIN TALBOT and DANGLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CARUTHERS v. USA
as 2:2024cv00309
Petitioner: TERRELL CARUTHERS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
THOMAS v. USA
as 1:2024cv01015
Petitioner: JOHN E. THOMAS
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
MARSHALL v. ARAMARK, LLC. et al
as 1:2024cv00991
Plaintiff: AUGUSTUS MARSHALL
Defendant: ARAMARK, LLC., GEO GROUP INC, MARK SEVIER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GARDNER v. PRETORIUS
as 2:2024cv00131
Petitioner: JALIEN GARDNER
Respondent: TRICIA PRETORIUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grace v. Calvart et al
as 3:2024cv00484
Plaintiff: O'Shun R Grace and O
Defendant: Jamie Calvart and Brian English
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PARKER v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00307
Plaintiff: GEORGE A. PARKER
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CHRISTINA REAGLE, TRICIA PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LOCKETT v. ARAMARK et al
as 1:2024cv01005
Plaintiff: CHRISTOPHER LOCKETT
Defendant: ARAMARK, FOX, FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01008
Plaintiff: RICCI DAVIS, JR.
Defendant: CENTURION HEALTH SORCES, LLC and JASON CARTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?