Cases 31 - 40 of 24,938
Butler et al v. Platt et al
as 5:2024cv03187
Plaintiff:
Phillip Mitchell Butler and Charles Gene Butler
Defendant:
Sergeant Katlyn M. Platt and Jerome Felder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Butler et al v. Dash
as 5:2024cv03188
Plaintiff:
Phillip Mitchell Butler and Charles Gene Butler
Defendant:
Judge Derrick F. Dash
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Alston v. Hicks
as 0:2024cv03209
Petitioner:
Londell Lashun Alston
Respondent:
Chief John Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Hosley v. Jansen
as 1:2024cv01621
Petitioner:
Otis Hosley
Respondent:
Warden Jansen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nichols v. SC Forestry Commission
as 4:2024cv03208
Plaintiff:
Linda B Nichols and Linda Bellamy Nichols
Defendant:
SC Forestry Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dwyer v. Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
as 5:2024cv03036
Petitioner:
Matthew C Dwyer
Respondent:
SCDC and Warden of Broad River Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Santos v. Garrett
as 6:2024cv03047
Plaintiff:
Eliseo Santos and Eliseo Santos,
Defendant:
Brice Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Goss v. Stonebreaker
as 2:2024cv03138
Plaintiff:
Darrell L. Goss
Defendant:
Donnie E. Stonebreaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyd v. State of South Carolina et al
as 7:2024cv03200
Plaintiff:
Latasha Monique Boyd and Latasha Boyd
Defendant:
South Carolina, State of, Spartanburg Sheriff Department, Duncan Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Greenville County Detention Center
as 6:2024cv03173
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lynn Robinson
Defendant:
Greenville County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
