Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in Arkansas
Cases 31 - 40 of 22,228
Boman v. Zimmerman et al
as 6:2024cv06079
Plaintiff: Michael Dewaine Boman
Defendant: Parole Officer Zimmerman, Parole Officer Starky and John Doe Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Striegel v. Peterson et al
as 6:2024cv06078
Plaintiff: Nathan Ferris Striegel
Defendant: Ms. Peterson, Sgt. Couler and Sgt. Windstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cummings v. Felts et al
as 4:2024cv00466
Plaintiff: Joshua Dontae Cummings
Defendant: John Felts, Brett Morgan, Andy Shock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fairchild v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2024cv00465
Plaintiff: Joseph Levell Fairchild
Defendant: Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Porter v. Harmon et al
as 3:2024cv00093
Plaintiff: Mark Porter
Defendant: Zachery S Harmon, Thomas Hurst, Janice Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fairchild v. Arkansas Department of Correction
as 4:2024cv00468
Plaintiff: Joseph Fairchild
Defendant: Arkansas Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Waller et al
as 4:2024cv04057
Plaintiff: Marcus Oneil Laquient Owens and Mark
Defendant: Ms. Waller, Ms. Arnold and Sheriff Wayne Easley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hale v. Waller et al
as 4:2024cv04056
Plaintiff: Harold Steve Hale and Scooter Hale
Defendant: Ms. Waller, Ms. Arnold and Sheriff Wayne Easley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goshade v. Doe
as 4:2024cv00460
Plaintiff: Joshua I Goshade
Defendant: Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Maccain
as 4:2024cv00463
Plaintiff: Christopher Robinson
Defendant: Maccain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?