Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in North Carolina
Cases 41 - 50 of 292
Kedzie v. Kelly
as 5:2022hc02190
Petitioner: Adam Phillips Kedzie
Respondent: Warden Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
RAMOS v. ADAMS
as 1:2022cv00960
Plaintiff: MIGUEL ANGEL FLOREZ RAMOS
Defendant: KAREN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONNELL v. ADAMS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2022cv00935
Plaintiff: ROGER DALE CONNELL, JR.
Defendant: KAREN ADAMS and SHERIFF VAN SHAW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Millsaps v. Mullen et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2022cv00162
Plaintiff: Marvin W. Millsaps
Defendant: Jason Todd Mullen, C. E. James, A. Dyson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mercado v. Hudson et al
as 5:2022ct03386
Plaintiff: Adam Latif Mercado
Defendant: Captain Hudson, LT. Dudley, Officer Perkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Galeas v. Gibson et al
as 5:2022ct03366
Plaintiff: Jorge Galeas, Jr.
Defendant: Sergeant Adam Gibson and Lieutenant Logan Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022hc02166
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 4241 Motion to Determine Mental Competency/Other Dist.
Moore v. Craven County et al
as 5:2022ct03360
Plaintiff: Sharif Hakim Moore
Defendant: Craven County, Jones County, City of New Bern and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. ADAMS
as 1:2022cv00769
Plaintiff: DAVEN WAYNE ADAMS
Defendant: KAREN ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hall v. Pierce
as 5:2022ct03324
Plaintiff: Adam W. Hall
Defendant: James F. Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?