Cases 41 - 50 of 5,697
Morales v. MN DOC et al
as 0:2024cv01091
Plaintiff:
Reynaldo Morales
Defendant:
MN DOC, MCF - Faribault, Jodi Atinsted and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kujak v. Minnesota, The State of
as 0:2024cv01092
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Jerry Roman Kujak
Defendant:
Minnesota, The State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glover v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv01125
Petitioner:
Andrew Glover
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Church v. Schnell et al
as 0:2024cv01235
Plaintiff:
Justin Dale Church
Defendant:
Paul Schnell, Jamison Doeden, Kathryn Halverson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Red Lake band of Chippewa et al
as 0:2024cv01797
Petitioner:
Santee Howard
Respondent:
Red Lake band of Chippewa and Red Lake tribal Courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Sayers v. Redlake Band of chippewa et al
as 0:2024cv01799
Petitioner:
Dezmyn Sayers
Respondent:
Redlake Band of chippewa and Redlake nation courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Semler v. Johnston et al
as 0:2024cv01850
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Semler
Defendant:
Nancy Johnston, Brian Ninneman and Marc Zika
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Edwards v. USA
as 0:2024cv01844
Petitioner:
Victor Devon Edwards
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Campbell v. State of Minnesota
as 0:2024cv01788
Petitioner:
Clifton Scott Campbell
Respondent:
State of Minnesota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Brott et al
as 0:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
Julyen Alozno Martin
Defendant:
Joel Brott, Sherburne Jail Commander, Jail Captains and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
